Even if you don't reach out like I hope you will, maybe some good can come simply from putting it on your radar. I'm just a happy user of it and Zotero who remembers an old conversation about Scrivener and sees an opportunity to head off a repeat of that situation. The idea is simply to open the communication channel.
#Obsidian vs zettlr full#
"If you avoid X and do Y, then full Zotero integration will be possible" could go a long way.įor right now, I think just writing an email that says something like "Hello, we're happy to hear you're interested in Zotero integration, just want to let you know that we're receptive to that possibility, let us know when/if you want to talk" would be sufficient. Because Obsidian is still so new, that situation can still be avoided – perhaps with nothing more than an exchange of few emails. It's simply too much to ask of either project.
#Obsidian vs zettlr code#
The gist of it, if I remember correctly, is that Scrivener made some decisions during it's early days that would essentially require either Zotero or Scrivener to rewrite tons of code from scratch. Why am I bringing all this up now? I remember a conversation about why Scrivener is unlikely to ever have Zotero integration. My hope is that somebody from Zotero might reach out just to establish an open communication channel. Probably won't be all that exciting if you don't use it.Īnyway, I wanted to put this on your radar because over in their forums, one of their most visible team members enthusiastically indicated that they'd be interested in Zotero integration. You don't have to use the Zettelkasten system to use Obsidian, but that's what it's designed for. It's a fascinating, weird, and – in my opinion – very promising system of taking and organizing notes. It's hard to explain why Obsidian is so exciting without understanding Zettelkasten. (I recently learned that it's led by the pair who make Dynalist, if anybody's familiar with that.) The developers are astonishingly productive, so it already seems remarkably polished and has a sizable and fast-growing user base. See image: link from top-level-note to note 20210516121857, which should actually link to “Note with title as filename”.Within the Zettelkasten community, a new text editor is quickly becoming popular. … does not understand UIDs defined in the YAML header, instead expects a note with that UID as filename. In this case, Obsidian does not understand that the “real” title is defined in the note’s YAML header. … understands UID-based links only if the UID is defined in the filename. While Zettlr understands that each of these notes has a title and an associated UID, Obsidian …: The *UID* of this note is defined in the YAML header. The *title* of this note is defined in the YAML header.
Title: "Top-level note /with/ special characters! ζ?" For instance, suppose I have three notes: Unfortunately, Obsidian does not seem to understand UID-based links. Given that I keep changing my note titles a lot, I absolutely rely on Zettlr’s use of the never-changing UID for linking.
In Zettlr, links to other notes always refer to the notes’ UID, a date-based 14-digit number, not to the notes’ titles. Unfortunately, I couldn’t figure out a way to make Zettlr and Obsidian fully compatible, and this is due to how the two apps handle internal links and information defined in the YAML header. Let me explain my problem: I have been setting up a Zettelkasten using the Zettlr app, and I would love to use Obsidian as well for the same stack of notes. Does anyone use Obsidian alongside with Zettlr, and how do you do it?
0 kommentar(er)
